Schreibheft. Zeitschrift für Literatur 104: Bjørn Aamodt, Lyn Hejinian, Rosmarie Waldrop Tor Ulven: Grabbeigaben Félix Guattari: 65 Träume von Franz Kafka Gilles Deleuze: Über die Malerei Kim Hyesoon: Autobiographie des Todes Furio Jesi: Spartakus. Symbologie der Revolte Ernesto García López: Hospital del aire Jan Pieter Barbian: Literaturpolitik im NS-Staat Volker Pantenburg: Einfachheit ohne Vereinfachung. Zur Praxis Harun Farockis Léon Poliakov: Vom Hass zum Genozid. Das Dritte Reich und die Juden Galina Rymbu: Meine Vagina Perrine Le Querrec: Soudain Nijinski
Schlagwort: Gilles Deleuze
Gilles Deleuze | Three Questions About Six fois deux (Godard)
Cahiers du Cinéma has asked you for an interview, because you’re a “Philosopher” and we wanted to do something philosophical, but more specifically because you like and admire Godard’s work. What do you think of his recent TV programs? Like many people, I was moved, and it’s a lasting emotion. Maybe I should explain my image of Godard. As someone who works a great deal, he must be a very solitary figure. But it’s not just any solitude, it’s an extraordinarily animated solitude. Full, not of dreams, fantasies, and projects, but of acts, things, people even. A multiple, creative solitude….
Peter Bouscheljong | dreaming of one thing [subversive chronicle]
i said endurance has its limits people are made of flesh and bone / i spoke about the stalinists and the method of executing the very best as traitors / who died screaming long live the party! / sifis said / the statement is only the beginning. then they will ask who are your friends. / then where do they live. katerina gogou i believe at heart that one must not be an accomplice to lies and compromise, the contemporary artist must scream out their revolt and make understood that we live in an unbearable, cruel, and…
The Power of Political, Militant, ‚Leftist‘ Cinema. Interview with Jacques Rancière
By Javier Bassa Vila Jacques Rancière’s thought is undisciplined, at least in two different but interlinked senses. On the one hand, in the 1970s Rancière suggested a reading of Marxism that broke with the dominant interpretations of the time, specially with the scientifist Marxism imposed by Althusser (see La leçon d’Althusser, originally published in 1976 and re-published in 2012 by La Fabrique – and due to come out soon in Spanish). On the other hand, the broad interest that his thought has triggered at an international level seems to be also the consequence of another in-discipline: his reflections are…
Fernand Deligny | The Arachnean and Other Texts
The originality of Deligny’s theoretical and practical position consists precisely in what can be called a „suspension of interpellation,“ in which one can also see a fundamental point of intersection with the inaugural gesture of psychoanalysis, over and beyond the explicit oppositions, as will become clear. One might say that to „the theoretical anti-humanism“ professed by Althusser, Deligny opposed an authentic „practical anti-humanism“ that dismissed „men,“ the humans-that-we-are, shored up by what Deleuze called a „thought image“ of themselves, a flattering, ready-made image, dominating and exclusive, in favor of a narcissistically and socially less satisfying „human,“ possibly mute and idle, but in reality more richly endowed with practical recompositions.
Deleuze/Guattari; How Do You Make Yourself a Body Without Organs?
At any rate, you have one (or several). It’s not so much that it preexists or comes ready-made, although in certain respects it is preexistent. At any Tate, you make one, you can’t desire without making one. And it awaits you; it is an inevitable exercise or experimentation, already accomplished the moment you undertake it, unaccomplished as long as you don’t. This is not assuring, because you can botch it. Or it can be terrifying, and lead you to your death. It is nondesire as well as desire. It is not at all a notion or a concept but…
Deleuze & Guattari; Capitalism: A Very Special Delirium
Actuel: When you describe capitalism, you say: “There isn’t the slightest operation, the slightest industrial or financial mechanism that does not reveal the dementia of the capitalist machine and the pathological character of its rationality (not at all a false rationality, but a true rationality of this pathology, of this madness, for the machine does work, be sure of it). There is no danger of this machine going mad, it has been mad from the beginning, and that’s where its rationality comes from.“ Does this mean that after this ‘abnormal’ society, or outside of it, there can be…







